Kelman Technologies Inc. (KTI) seems to be benefiting from the industry downturn by implementing the new paradigm of off-site shared storage for seismic data. Following the growth of its seismic data management services in the Canadian energy market, Kelman has announced a brand new Archive Division located in Houston. The new center will be equipped with KTIs suite of seismic data management services from, bit to bit data reproduction to fully integrated on-line seismic data collections. Kelmans flagship DMASS service organizes and reconciles clients field, stack, section and support data. DMASS then creates an electronic library which allows instant retrieval any of the clients seismic data on-line, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. DMASS is a combined hardware and software offering built upon technology from IBM (ADSM distributed storage manager) and Sun Microsystems. The indexes and other metadata are stored in a database built around the Public Petroleum Data Model Associations standard.
Revenues strong
KTI report strong take-up of the system in Calgary which has resulted in record reported revenues in Q3 1998 for the division. Continued growth is anticipated for 1999 with the signing of 7 new archive contracts in the past 8 weeks. KTI now boasts some 30 subscribers to the Archive services. One satisfied client is seismic broker Request Seismic Surveys (RSS). which has struck a deal with KTI for storage and delivery of its brokered data. Todd Chuckry President of RSS claims, "The speed and accuracy of our data transactions has afforded us a competitive advantage that we are beginning to realize more as time progresses". Another happy Kelman client is Gulf Canada Resources (see PDM Vol 2 N° 6). GCRs Alice Bienia stated recently "More complete, integrated and accurate seismic data is being served on-line to our exploration community in minutes, resulting in effective decision making by our geophysicists Gulf has taken a significant step forward in establishing a strategic advantage in its exploration and trade data activities."
New Boss
Heading up the Houston operations is 20 year industry veteran Francis Bourgeois who becomes the Archive Regional Manager for the Gulf of Mexico. Bourgeois has over 20 years of seismic industry experience, most recently as President of The Woodlands Geophysical Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PGS Data Management Inc., and Vice President of GeoBank, USA. Previous responsibilities include positions as Chief Geophysicist and Manager of Exploration with Pennzoils European office. Monica Sloan, President of KTI stated "We are pleased to have Francis spearhead the introduction of our revolutionary seismic data management solution to the Houston energy community." More from
http://www.kelman.com
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_1 as the subject.
OpenSpirit, the application integration framework developed and
marketed by PrismTech, was launched at SEG 98. The intention is to allow software
applications from different vendors and proprietary in-house developed tools to
interoperate with various industry standard E&P databases. Ben Weltevrede, operator of
the OpenSpirit Alliance said "Through this joint initiative we will step up
development efforts to reach our goal of creating true interoperability among
heterogeneous applications and platforms. The ultimate success of OpenSpirit hinges on the
availability of end-user products." Critical mass "We fully expect this group of companies to bring a critical mass
to the market before 2000." Currently products including gOcad, CGGs
StratiMagic, PDS's Geographical Data Selector Elfs Sismage and Shell Services' EPDM
Tools have been demonstrated on the OpenSpirit framework. These tools use OpenSpirit to
read information from vendor data stores such as GeoQuests Geoframe and
Landmarks OpenWorks. The OpenSpirit technology also rests upon work done by the
Petrotechnical Open Software Corp. (POSC) in the field of E&P business objects. Donald
Paul, corporate vice president, Technology and Environmental Affairs for Chevron
Corporation, stated, "Chevron is pleased to see major technology suppliers, such as
PGS, GeoQuest and CGG committing to use the OpenSpirit object framework. We feel that an
open software integration platform, based on standards, offers significant benefits to
both oil companies and commercial software vendors. " PDM analysis OpenSpirit members fall into three categories. First there are the
founding fathers those rare breed oils who actually still do hands-on
software development. These companies will be using OpenSpirit to deploy their in-house
specialist software in a semi-commercial environment, by allowing the research tools to
access industry standard data stores i.e. GeoFrame and OpenWorks. Next we have the vendors
of such data stores, or rather, since this announcement, we now have at least one of them
GeoQuest (Landmark is still conspicuous by its absence from OpenSpirit see
this months editorial). GeoQuests president, Thierry Pilenko has stated that
GeoQuest would be "Opening our systems to allow best-in-class and best-in-process
products to interoperate." This is interesting in that it suggests that GeoQuest is
confirming its role as a compliant datastore, rather than joining the OpenSpirit
Applications set (for a humorous interpretation of the positioning of major vendors in the
standards game see the Vendors Tale (August 1996) on the PDM CD free with this
issue). Finally there are the wannabes the real potential beneficiaries of the
OpenSpirit paradigm. GOCad, PDS, CGG with StratiMagic and now PGS with the whole of the
Tigress suite of applications just waiting to plug and play with the major datastores.
What the position of the datastore vendors would be if the wannabes actually started to
carve out market share with OpenSpirit-compliant plug-ins remains to be seen. Only time
will tell whether the momentum of OpenSpirit will prove sufficient to overcome the
inevitable tensions in such a mixture of protagonists.
PGS and GeoQuest join OpenSpirit Alliance, Fast track deployment announced (January 1999)
PGS and CGG have signed up with the OpenSpirit Alliance (OSA - see PDM Vol 3 N° 9) bringing the tally to 14 companies (5 oils and 8 service). An OSA core-group comprising PGS, CGG, GeoQuest, Shell, Chevron and Elf have announced plans to 'accelerate the joint deployment of the OpenSpirit framework in their application portfolios'.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_2 as the subject.
OpenSpirit Developer's Kit available and packaging announced (January 1999)
PrismTech have announced the availability of a pre-release version of the OpenSpirit V1.0 Developers Kit and indicate how the commercial versions of OpenSpirit will bepackaged.
Following the first pre-release beta, PrismTech will continue its internal and external testing of a second pre-release early in 1999 and will roll out the first production release soon thereafter. The final commercial packaging of OpenSpirit will be in the form of a development kit and a run time license for system users. The dev kit will allow programmers to develop OpenSpirit-compliant, component-based E&P applications; either for developing new software or for integrating existing applications and data-stores via OpenSpirit. The end-user oriented OpenSpirit run-time platform for E&P software system users, will be transparent to the user - except for the license fee! Customers who would like to evaluate the first pre-release are invited to contact Ahsan Rahi at PrismTech - mar@us.prismtechnologies.com.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_3 as the subject.
1998, from riches to rags, a tale of yet another downturn. (January 1999)
PDMs Editor, Neil McNaughton reflects on a year which started with a bang and ended with a whimper. From a bullish start, to a dire and desperate end with clouds on every horizon. But we had some fun on theway.
Last January we were basking in the enthusiastic post-SEG glow, the industry had a) convinced itself that the good times were back, and b) that we were going to be serious about things this time around. As an indication, late 1997 we were reporting on forecasts of severe staff shortages as the industry took off again. Well that didnt last long did it. But 1998 did have its high points, which were "consolidation, consolidation and consolidation". Consolidation amongst vendors with IHS finishing off its bulimic spree acquiring PI/Dwights, MAI Consultants, IEDS and others and IBMs fire sale of Petrobank to PGS.
Mega-merge
Another consolidation involves the mega-mergers of the major oils. Incidentally, I was driving back from town yesterday, stuck in some traffic when I noticed a sign that said "BP Mobil!" In France, it is neither BP-Amoco, nor Exxon-Mobil, but rather a mega-mega merged BP-Exxon-Amoco-Mobil which supplies us with gas at around $4.4 a gallon! On another front, Bob Peebler, writing in the Oil and Gas Journal, advocated the formation of a mega SEG/AAPG/SPE organization, to enhance inter-disciplinary cooperation and reduce Landmarks exhibitors fees!
Gates enters the fray
The spectacular entry of Microsoft into E&P computing was another highlight, with a memorable videotaped message from Bill himself to the attendees at the Landmark Worldwide Technology Forum. The thrust of the message that Landmark was to be beta testing COM on UNIX may seem a little bizarre with hindsight, but the presence was tangible. Microsofts presence at the SEG was equally real, with lots of DEC Alpha boxes re-labeled as "Compaq", and running NT of course. Microsoft still has some way to go with NT which, although ubiquitous in the stand-alone application end of the market, has failed to make much of an impact with the major application suites. These are still anchored in the SUN/UNIX world and are likely to remain so for a while. High performance computing and visualization are just that, and currently the push is towards 64 bit computing, although Segas 128 bit games console might leap-frog the UNIX crowd here!
Standards
Standards organizations had something of a bad time, with POSC re-inventing itself after the gravy-train funding of the original sponsors has evaporated. In the funding confusion, new-geometry projects such as the Shared Earth Model are still struggling to take-off, although the recently announced Synergy initiative (POSC and Oracle) looks promising. More on this in next months PDM. OpenSpirit is beginning to look like an interesting development in the fields of standards and interoperability, while both Geoshare and PPDM (with a big welcome for the new CEO Scott Beaugrand) still have wide support in their respective communities. RODE encapsulation of seismic data is gaining some currency and the UKs PESGB is doing stalwart work re-writing the aging SEG-Y standard.
PDM Interoperability survey
Finally wed like to mention one of PDMs contributions to 1998, our interoperability survey. Over the past year we have had statements from POSC, PPDM, CGG, GeoQuest, Geoshare and Microsoft. Landmark is of course conspicuous by its absence here and has stated repeatedly that interoperability, for Landmark, is provided by Oracles SQL-Net. A pragmatic response, but not very enlightening in terms of say, Landmarks position vis a vis OpenSpirit. To set things straight on this latter issue we bring you PDMs quote of the year. At the OpenSpirit launch party in a steamy New Orleans last November, Landmarks John Gibson, asked pointedly "When will Shell start eating their own dog-food?" Now thats what I call a position statement.
Fin de siècle
So what of 1999? Well with the downturn, and the year 2000 on the horizon, dont hold your breath waiting for massive IT investment. It will be heads down and all hands to the pump for a while. But a bit of a pause may be a blessing in disguise if we can use the time to fix some of the broken bits, and to educate those who in better times would be too busy to listen to us. So if I have one message for 1999 going on 2000, it is this. Make good use of the quiet times to put some order in your houses. Breathe a sigh of relief that there is no money for a Visionarium which would only cloud the issue anyhow. Try to streamline your work-flows and enhance the quality of the data in your custody. And finally, educate, fight your corner, let management know that quality, accessible data is mission-critical, that millions of dollars have been lost and will be lost by data management and IT failures. It aint easy, and we aint through yet.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_4 as the subject.
The special Y2K compliant version of Landmarks application suite,
"Release 98Plus" is now shipping. Claiming market leadership, Landmarks
Keith Johnston, director of the Y2K program stated "Our focus now is providing
comprehensive services and support to E&P companies as they migrate to Y2K compliant
environments as early in 1999 as possible. Accompanying the new software is a services
offering dubbed Y2K Ready, Set Go! This includes site planning and assessment,
audit trail planning, Y2K testing, operating system upgrades, tuning, and trouble
shooting. The British Standards Institute Y2K Conformity Guidelines form the core of
Landmarks Y2K initiative, and the whole Y2K development and testing program has been
audited and validated by Data Dimensions Inc.(DDI). DDI is a pioneer of many of the
processes that consulting firms use today. In 1997 Data Dimensions introduced Ardes 2k, a
knowledge-based process manager for Year 2000 projects. Recently DDI was retained by
Microsoft Corporation to provide quality assurance and testing services for Microsoft's
portable Windows CE operating system. Its nice to think that the Y2K problem is good for
some people. Indeed Y2K has been very good for DDI whose revenues for 1998 were $114.5
million, a hike of 90 percent.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_5 as the subject.
For virtual realists on the move, Fakespace of Mountain View
California, is marketing a transportable VR display unit. the Mini Workbench has a 44 inch
diagonal field of view and is designed to fold down for easy movement within the office or
for shipment to exhibitions and storage. Thess adjustable, drafting table-style
rear-projected unit allows for real time viewing and interaction with computer-generated
imagery. Three models are available, two with full 3D visualization capability using
Electrohome Marquee 8500 CRT projectors and a third with 2D capability only, using LCD
projection technology offering a megapixel screen bandwidth. Cost of the unit is in the
range $57,000 to $69,000 depending on options. More from
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_6 as the subject.
Robert White Jr., President and CEO of WhiteStar stated, "We are
extremely excited about this acquisition not only because of its obvious importance to our
company but because of its importance to our present and future customers. For the first
time, we will be able to deliver a seamless nationwide land survey database. We are
pleased that we were PRDC's first choice and are confident that our customers will benefit
greatly." Dr. Jay E. Leonard, President of PRDC, commented "PRDC and WhiteStar
have had a longstanding working relationship and share a commitment to providing the
highest quality data." PRDC is a privately held company and is independent of Platte
River Associates, Inc., the petroleum systems software developer of which Leonard is also
CEO. Platte River Associates, Inc. was not involved in the current transaction, except for
licensing certain digitizing software to WhiteStar Corporation. Altira Group LLC, a
Denver-based venture management firm specializing in advanced technology for the oil and
gas industry, financed the acquisition. More from Stephen Pickett on 303-781-5182, and
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_7 as the subject.
For BPs technology guru Chris Mottershead, the collapse of the
oil price and the concomitant restructuring of the oil industry is an event of magnitude
comparable to the breakup of standard Oil at the (last) turn of the century, or to the
first middle east oil price hike back in the early 70s. BP are projecting low oil
prices for some considerable time (see Baird article in this issue for a more
optimistic viewpoint). The revised gospel according to BP is that Oil has become a
commodity, and it is in the nature of things for commodities to get cheaper. A
50% forecast slow-down in world growth for 1999 does not help matters. In Business Process
Reengineering (BPR) terms, the options for a company are usually to be either small,
responsive and focused or big enough to benefit from economies of scale. BPs plan
therefore, is to be both of these by creating some 134 new assets and keeping a thin
umbrella organization to reap the benefits of scale. Impact on data management Since we are therefore in a low margin business, there is no long term
money any more for mundane chores like Data Management. Mottershead painted a jaded
picture of the history of data management in BP. From the early days when BP realized they
had 34 varieties of SEG-Y in house, through the POSC data model, Common Data Aaccess, to
integrated tools such as GeoFrame. Current interest centers on the Shared Earth Model from
Geomatic used to store interpreted data in a geo-registered 3D environment - and
common workflows from Landmark. But there is still a huge gap between reality and
aspirations, we are still "searching for high quality data and we get irritated when
it is not there". Mottershead suggested that we should back off from such aspirations
of perfection. Far from the vaunted 80/20 rule where solutions should aim at
supplying the 80 % of the most used functionality, current data management struggles to
get near to a 50% solution to our woes. Mottersheads solution? A top-down analysis
beginning at the level of the business process and going down to the nitty-gritty level of
SEG-Y and the like.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_8 as the subject.
Neil, Too bad that the news on the new OpenSpirit members didn't become public before the
December issue of PDM -- you might have altered the table of frameworks to list several of
the entries as "OpenSpirit". I must say that I found your list of "BO
frameworks " a bit of a mixed bag. For example, I don't think of DAEX as being the
same sort of beast as either GeoFrame or OpenWorks -- likewise, being CORBA-based or not
is not the defining characteristic of a business object framework. I understand that
you're trying to make the case that different organizations still have different
underlying software infrastructures, but the comparisons in the table seem a little
uneven. Also, distributed object architectures can include APIs; the interesting point is
that applications are constructed in significantly different ways; it's not just a
renaming exercise. Monolithic Programming and deploying monolithic applications in C (or any other language) is
significantly different from building systems from collections of components. Component
based development requires a different (new) way of thinking about the application
business. It's all about reuse of components, an ability to add new functionality
incrementally, improved connectivity to data from different sources, lower maintenance
costs, reliability and rapid deployment. I agree that even with all the above and the
level of interoperability promised by frameworks such as OpenSpirit, we will still have to
deal with many of the fundamental data issues that you list in the article. While better
application interoperability will not solve all the information management issues that we
face, better interoperability will greatly improve our ability to share information - an
important development in its own right. New website By the way, I checked out your rejuvenated website. The site is good. Lots of good
information nicely arranged. The main complaint that I have is that when I do a search
from http://www.the-data-room.com/Pdm/main.htm the dates associated with the articles
refer to when they hit the disk rather than the dates they were published. This makes it a
little difficult to decide what to look at and in which order. Or maybe I missed
something. In any event, I'm sure that I'll spend some time on the site. All the best for
another "interesting" year. David Archer.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_9 as the subject.
Neil, In last months PDM you queried how exactly PowerPlan could claim to be POSC
compliant. Firstly we would like to point out that while POSC has not to-date specified
all aspects of compliance for products developed on the PC environment, most of the POSC
E&P standards, especially the data standards critical to integration and
interoperability with other products (e.g., the Epicentre data model), are platform
independent. These standards hence apply equally to products developed on PC or UNIX
platform. PowerPlan, a key application in the Drilling Office suite recently
commercialized by GeoQuest, uses the GeoFrame data store, and logical data model, to
access data. The GeoFrame data model compliance with the POSC Epicentre has been already
established. SIP The data store used by PowerPlan is identical to, and is actually shared by, all the
products developed on the GeoFrame SIP (Software Integration Platform), whether on UNIX or
Windows NT operating system. Note that POSC is planning to launch a new project to upgrade
the BCS (Base Computing Standards) to include PC as well as UNIX. Assuming this project is
launched, we would consider contributing the standards specifications used to develop the
Drilling Office product to POSC. You also raised the question as to how newly-acquired
products from OTS be POSC compliant. In reality, the OTS software, TDAS and WEST, are not
currently POSC compliant since they are a new addition to Geoquest's suite Drilling
Office. Once their data standards will be integrated with Drilling Office in the next
versions they will adopt the similar POSC compliancy above mentioned used for PowerPlan. Najib Abusalbi and Davide Santini, GeoQuest.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_10 as the subject.
My company is actively involved in upstream data management throughout
the world and consequently, as with most of you, the health of the data management
business is of prime concern. In January 1998 I was asked to give a paper at the SMI data
management conference discussing why the then current climate favored data management and
what companies could do to take advantage of the situation. When asked to give an update
at the 1999 conference, we decided to take a rain check on data management activity and
intentions throughout the industry and in January this year polled 19 companies in Europe,
the USA and Australia. We received replies from 14 companies which was quite an honorable
turnout. Replies all came from data management specialists, so they do represent the
current and likely future state of play in the companies surveyed. progress In the survey we asked about progress with regard to a number of
specific data management activities, differences in data management resources and budgets
between 1998 and 1999, and principal projects undertaken in 1998 and planned for 1999. We
also looked at factors that were currently enabling or constraining data management
progress. We found that a large majority of our respondents had defined their objectives
in data management, although such objectives in most cases had been set out relatively
recently. We then asked companies whether they had instigated any measurement of their
achievement of these objectives. Approximately one third of the sample were monitoring
their progress, with another third intending to do so. Standards figured high in the data
managers priorities. Enforced Over half enforced at least some standards, procedures and processes,
with nearly all the remainder planning, or implementing these. Only 10% of the sample had
no policy on standards. We also looked at who does what in the data management field,
first by checking whether there was any attempt to define roles and responsibilities. 66%
had defined roles, 5% had no role definition, with the rest in various stages of planning.
A similar picture emerges for the actual assignation of responsibility; two thirds have
formally assigned data management responsibilities. Looking further into who was actually
doing the data management we found the roles distributed as follows; The reasons for the changes were cited as follows: The bottom five categories were cited as reasons for decline and the
top four as positive factors where resources would stay the same or increase. A similar
picture emerged for data management budgets, which are generally forecast as down on 1999.
Id like to summarize the results of our findings. Theres good news and bad
news. Bad news Lack of interest at the middle management level. Shortage of qualified/experienced people. Regional budget cuts and limited resources. Low oil price affecting data management benefits and disrupting current projects. Rate of technology change. Awareness of the importance of data management at ground level, not matched by
management willingness to supply resources to tackle the problem. Good news Top level management convinced of requirement for data management effort and
expenditure. Data being treated as an asset. Operating companies have separate budgets. Objective is to integrate all data types. Web and GIS access to data stores. CD, and soon DVD, technology at the desktop. Enhanced inventories of on-line and archived data have reduced the time required to
find data. In the survey, we also asked for a time line as to when each stage of
planning or implementing data management activity had been initiated. A small but
significant trend was observable in so far as most of the work started in 1992, the heyday
of data management was 1997, with a small decline in the numbers for 1998. We suspect that
this reflects renewed short-termism in the industry rather than a job completed! The full
results of our survey are available on the Stephenson and Associates website at
http://www.s-and-a.com.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_11 as the subject.
Petroleum Information/Dwights Canada Ltd., (PIDC) has signed a Letter
of Intent to purchase International Petrodata Limited (IPL). Closure is anticipated by mid
February. The deal will bring the IPL well file together with PIDCs land data. The
move is intriguing in the light of earlier consolidation in the Calgary data vendor arena.
Mapping software vendor Accumap previously had an agreement with IPL to supply the IPL
dataset in Accumap format. This provided Calgary customers with what was considered by
some as a best of breed combination. Last year, Accumap Enerdata Corp. was acquired by QC
Data, Calgarys main local data vendor and competitor to PI/Dwights. A Calgary source
told PDM "IPL is recognized in Calgary as having the best quality comprehensive
database of Canadian wells thanks to their rigorous process of data capture and
verification. Similarly, Accumap has proved a very successful application for the delivery
of such data. The new deal brings some complicated issues to customers using Accumap and
the IPL dataset and generally, the Calgary data market is shaking down to a battle between
QC Data and IHS Energy."
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_12 as the subject.
The High Performance Visualization and Computing Summit,
sponsored by Silicon Graphics Computer Systems (SGI), was held in Galveston, Texas this
month with around 325 attendees, representing 78 businesses and organizations from 15
countries. Nineteen vendors exhibited several applications of immersive visualization
technologies. Thirty presentations and discussion panels addressed topics ranging from the
basics of the technology to its effects on workflow. Case studies illustrated the
technology's business value and role in the workplace. No escape Immersive visualization fills the users field of view,
monopolizing the visual sense. One speaker said, "You can't get away from the
data!" while Mike Zeitlin of Texaco added "Let the mind look at it".
Immersive visualization fosters collaboration among members of a multi-disciplinary team.
Within the room-size scale of an immersion facility, team members can readily communicate
to each other comments, concerns, issues and discoveries. Real-time sharing of information
and expertise enables knowledge workers to consider more aspects of the displayed content.
Such lively collaboration, yields a higher quality intellectual product with better
understood risk factors. Examples included; changing the location of a seafloor facility
to reduce pipeline costs, and optimizing the number of wells required to drain a
reservoir. Large exploration projects normally requiring months of analysis can be
completed in weeks or less thanks to immersive visualization. Management comprehension of
project results is also facilitated. Although one contrary opinion was expressed by a
vocal proponent of immersive visualization. "Keep managers away from it!" he
warned. Selling VR Technology issues range from the inadequacy of the technical standards
necessary for data and systems integration, to the slow progress of software vendors in
retrofitting popular software to this technology. Several immersive visualization
facilities were installed across the petroleum industry last year. A concern amongst
attendees was the need to "sell" this expensive technology to management during
the industry's current downturn. The value of immersive visualization lies in enhancing
opportunity and avoiding risks. For example, immersive technology helps interpreters
"see" a variety of obscure drilling prospects that, in the aggregate, may be as
valuable as a large, obvious seismic structure. Cost reduction benefits were considered to
be of secondary importance. Some issues have yet to be adequately addressed:
Click here to comment on this article adaptability of people to the teamwork dynamics that occurs within an immersion
workspace the business implications of a potentially rapid deployment of this technology across
the industry adjustment of managers to the pace and other administrative demands of the new work
environment The ultimate value of immersive visualization technology is limited by the effects of
issues that are associated more with business culture and system integration than the
visualization technology itself. Copyright ©1999 Fourth Wave Group, Inc. 713 932-1901 and
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_14 as the subject.
With collaborative teams cramming into restrictive environments such as
the Vision Dome or the Cave, co-workers run the risk of injury to each other and to the
facility through involuntary movement of limbs. The answer to this problem is the VR
Arm-Waving Jacket available exclusively from PDM. This smart apparel restricts movement to
a level suitable for interdisciplinary collaboration, while avoiding injury to coworkers
and damage to the facility. Special Co-Operative tags on the AW-Jacket allow a whole asset
team to be attached together virtually guaranteeing interdisciplinary cooperation. Holders
for coffee cups also available. We are also working on a virtual ejection seat to allow
virtually enlightened knowledge workers to blast themselves straight into the board room.
The VR Arm-Waving Jacket is available from PDM at the special price of $99.99 plus
(virtual) taxes.
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_15 as the subject.
Click here to comment on this article Schlumberger Limited reported operating revenue for 1998 of $11.82
billion, an increase of 2% over 1997. Before the third quarter charge, net income and
diluted earnings per share were $1.39 billion and $2.49, 1% higher than last year.
Oilfield Services revenue declined 10% as the rig count fell 30%. Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer Euan Baird commented: "The weakening in E&P spending provoked
by the flattening of demand in 1998 will continue well into this year." Recovery in sight! Baird continued "We expect that falling non-OPEC supply due to the
decreased expenditure, coupled with a recovery in the Asian oil demand, will produce
higher oil prices and oilfield services activity in early 2000." For the technically
inclined, Schlumberger report a world record in marine acquisition. The
seismic boat Geco Orion set a new standard by towing 6 streamers, each 8 km long in a
spread 1 km wide (5 miles by 3,300 feet)! PDM was wondering what the processing mute looks
like on an 8 km spread?
Click here to comment on this article
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_17 as the subject.
Landmark Y2K R98 plus. (January 1999)
Landmark have rolled out a year 2000 complaint version of the release 98 suite of E&P applications, with a little help from Data Dimensions Inc.
Fakespace VR on the move (January 1999)
Virtual Reality takes to the road with portable VR from Fakespace. Entry-level fold-away VR displays start at $57,000.
WhiteStar Corp. Acquires Platte River Digital Cartography (January 1999)
WhiteStar Corporation has acquired Platte River Digital Cartography (PRDC) and now boasts a complete 1:24,000 scale Public Land Survey database to complement its exclusive Texas land survey database.
BP Amoco 'Be big and small at the same time!' (January 1999)
Speaking at the 2nd SMI Annual E&P Data Management Conference in London this month, Chris Mottershead, Technology Business Manager with BP Amoco described how the new conglomerate was set to square the circle by being both big gaining economies of scale AND small, quick-witted and smart, by breaking the whole behemoth into 134 business units throughout the world.
Letter from David Archer, POSC (January 1999)
PDMs BO-frameworks - a mixed bag!
Letter from Najib Abusalbi and Davide Santini, GeoQuest. (January 1999)
Is PowerPlan POSC Compliant?
Data Managers polled in S&A Survey (January 1999)
Helen Stephenson, Director of Stephenson and Associates (S&A) presented the results of a survey that S&A carried out recently at the SMI Data Management conference in London. Helen has kindly supplied this resume of the results of the survey, which offers some interesting metrics on the current status of data management in E&P.
Finally we looked into resource allocation forecasts for 1999 and found that over half of
the sample will be devoting less resources to data management in 1999 over the previous
year.
IHS Energy to purchase Canadian data outlet. (January 1999)
IHS Energy unit PI/Dwights Canada is in the process of finalizing the acquisition of Calgary-based International Petrodata Limited. IPL is thought to possess one of the best-kept well databases in the business
Virtual Reality comes of Age at Silicons Galveston show. (January 1999)
Following PDMs downbeat review of VR (see PDM Vol 3 No 10) Silicon Graphics have made a significant pitch for explorationists virtual hearts and minds at the 1999 High Performance Visualization and Computing Summit held at Galveston, Texas. Laramie Winczewski, president of Fourth Wave Group (http://www.fourthwavegroup.com) has kindly supplied us with an enthusiastic view from the exhibition floor.
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_13 as the subject.
System integration of the immersive visualization product with related technical infrastructure components (January 1999)
impact of content quality/availability on the effective use of a visualization facility
Special Offer VR jacket (January 1999)
PDM announces availability of the 'VR Arm-Waving Jacket' for use in confined workplaces such as the VisionDome and the Cave. This essential equipment allows virtual asset teams to gesticulate in safety.
Upcoming Conferences (January 1999)
Dates for your Diary....
March 2 - 4 GeoQuest European User Forum Paris Christine Hatcher Hatcher@gatwick.geoquest.slb.com March 15-16 First Conferences Knowledge Management London Rachel Hardy +44 171 400 9595 Rachel@firstconf.com April 7-9 IGN/ISPRS 3D Geospatial Data Production Paris Ghislaine Bordes +33 1 4398 8581
www.ign.fr/sfpt/manifestations/paris_99_us.html April 11-14 AAPG Annual Convention San Antonio 916 560 2617 April 26-28 PNEC Petroleum Data Integration Conference. Houston Philip Crouse 214 841 0046
crouse_phil@msn.com.
April 29-30 PPDM Spring Meeting Houston Carol Paulin Info@ppdm.org
If your browser does not work with the MailTo button, send mail to
pdm@oilit.com with PDM_V_3.3_9901_16 as the subject.
Baird forecasts upturn in early 2000! (January 1999)
Schlumberger 1998 Results show slight rise, and CEO Euan Baird makes a bold forecast for an industry upturn early in 2000.
© 1996-2024 The Data Room SARL All rights reserved. Web user only - no LAN/WAN Intranet use allowed. Contact.